Is helping Ukraine worth risking WW3?
Last Updated: 02.07.2025 12:39
Ukraine refusing to surrender to Russia in February 2022 is WW3.
Ukraine’s incursion into Russia is undeniably WW3.
Letting Ukraine strike Russia with their home-made weapons is WW3.
'Mum's young-onset dementia is 'heartbreaking' says Bristol woman - BBC
Ukraine’s getting invitation to NATO is WW3?
Just in the last 5 years:
Sending HIMARS is surely WW3.
Who’s the smartest Hollywood celebrity?
Ukraine getting Javelins is WW3.
Let’s just make it real clear:
Russia can stop this any time.
Cole? Kyle? Whatever the name, M's thrilled to see Young arrive in majors - The Seattle Times
Sending weapons to Ukraine is certainly WW3.
Sending MANPADS/ATGMs to Ukraine is undoubtedly WW3.
Trump approving to kill Soleimani is WW3.
Doctors Say You Might Be Eating Way Too Much Salt — Here’s How To Tell - BuzzFeed
What’s next?
Sending Abrams tanks is absolutely WW3.
Thank you.
Searching for axions by analyzing X-ray observations of entire galaxies - Phys.org
Sending ATACMS is WW3.
Sending Stormshadow/Scalp missiles is WW3.
Letting Ukraine strike targets in Crimea is WW3.
At what point did you realize it was the right time to leave your job?
Please kindly ask Mr Putin to avoid the WW3.
Supplying Ukraine with Tomahawks is WW3? Stationing western troops in Odesa is WW3?
All they have to do is to withdraw their troops.
Any day of the week — including Sundays.
“It’s going to be WW3!” is the most notorious notion used by fear-mongers for years.
Sending F16s to Ukraine is WW3.
Germany’s Merz ventures into Trump’s lion’s den - politico.eu
Ukraine kicking Russia out of Ukraine is WW3?
Ukrainians are so tired of hearing all this nonsense.
Letting Ukraine fire ATACMS at Russian air bases is patently conclusively unequivocally WW3.
Civilization VII patch lets you turn off some controversial new features - Ars Technica